Global Balanced Income Fund

The Fund seeks to provide stable, long-term capital appreciation by investing in a diversified portfolio of local and international bonds, equities and other income-generating assets. The Investment Manager shall diversify the assets of the Fund among different assets classes. The manager may invest in both Investment Grade and High Yield bonds rated at the time of investment at least “B-” by S&P, or in bonds determined to be of comparable quality, provided that the Fund may invest up 10% in non- rated bonds, whilst maintain an exposure to direct rated bonds of at least 25% of the value of the Fund. Investments in equities may include but are not limited to dividend-paying securities, equities, exchange traded funds as well as through the use of Collective Investment Schemes.

The Fund is actively managed, not managed by reference to any index.

The Fund is classified under Article 6 of the SFDR meaning that the investments underlying this financial product do not take into account the EU criteria for environmentally sustainable economic activities.

The Investment Manager of the CC High Income Bond Funds – EUR and USD has the duty to ensure that the underlying investments of the funds are well diversified. According to the prospectus, the investment manager has to abide by a number of investment restrictions to safeguard the value of the assets

• We shall invest primarily in a diversified portfolio of listed transferable securities across a wide spectrum of industries and sectors primarily via bonds, equities and eligible ETFs. We may invest in these asset classes either directly or indirectly through UCITS Funds and/ or eligible non UCITS Funds
• We intend to diversify the assets of the Sub-Fund broadly among countries, industries and sectors, but reserve the right to invest a substantial portion of the Sub-Fund’s assets in one or more countries (or regions) if economic and business conditions warrant such investments
• Investments in equity securities may include, but are not limited to, dividend-paying securities, equities, ETFs and preferred shares of global issuers. At our discretion, we may also invest indirectly in equities and equity-related instruments through the use of collective investment schemes. The Sub-Fund will generally, but not exclusively, invest in blue chip issuers listed on Approved Regulated Markets, including equities listed on the Malta Stock Exchange, where applicable
• We shall manage the credit risk and will aim to manage interest rate risk through credit analysis and credit diversity. We may invest in both investment grade (corporate and sovereign) and high yield bonds that have a credit rating of at least “B-” by S&P (or rating equivalent issued by other reputable rating agencies) at the time of investment, provided that the Sub-Fund may invest a maximum of 10% of its assets in non-rated debt securities, including those listed on the Malta Stock Exchange. We will, at all times, maintain an exposure to direct rated bonds, whether investment grade or high yield, of at least 25% of the value of the Sub-Fund
• For temporary or defensive purposes, the Sub-Fund may invest in short-term fixed income instruments, money market funds, cash and cash equivalents. The Sub-Fund may also hold cash and cash equivalents on an ancillary basis or cash management purposes, pending investment in accordance with its Investment Policy and to meet operating expenses and redemption requests.The Sub-Fund may invest in Real Estate Investment Trusts (“REITs”) via UCITS-eligible ETFs and/or CIS and securities related to real assets (including but not limited to real estate, agriculture, and precious metals-related securities) such as equities, bonds, and ETFs as well as CISs as long as these constitute eligible assets under the UCITS Directive
• The Sub-Fund may invest in options, futures and forwards for risk management and hedging purposes only (“Hedging Instruments”)
• Other than any margins required for these Hedging Instruments, the Sub-Fund will not employ leverage

December 2025

Introduction

In December, financial markets recouped the losses incurred in November, although the rebound fell short of the exuberance typically associated with the year-end holiday period. As the year closed, markets were left in a markedly different configuration from that which had characterized the previous decade. U.S. equities failed to reassert leadership, reflecting valuation fatigue, adverse currency dynamics, and the diminishing marginal contribution of mega-cap technology stocks to overall market performance. Market leadership broadened meaningfully, favouring sectors more closely linked to fiscal expansion, defence related spending, and supply-chain re-localization. At the same time, the artificial intelligence investment cycle continued to dominate capital allocation decisions. While questions intensified around the near-term returns of large scale AI infrastructure investment, emerging supply bottlenecks reintroduced scarcity dynamics reminiscent of the post-pandemic period. Geopolitical uncertainty remained a persistent risk premium embedded across asset classes. Although tentative optimism surrounding diplomatic developments in Eastern Europe provided support to European markets toward year-end, broader geopolitical fragmentation showed little evidence of reversal. Trade policy realignment, expanding industrial subsidies, and increased competition over strategic resources continued to shape cross-border capital flows, reinforcing the shift away from globalization toward a more fragmented, bloc oriented economic order. Taken together, after navigating an eventful and structurally transformative 2025, markets enter 2026 with diminished confidence in a return to familiar norms, yet arguably better equipped and more resilient in the face of heightened volatility.

On the monetary-policy front, the FED lowered the federal funds rate by 25 basis points at its December meeting, bringing the target range to 3.5%-3.75%. This was widely anticipated by markets, taking borrowing costs to their lowest level since 2022. Policymakers remained divided regarding the balance of risks between inflation persistence and labour market conditions. Several FOMC members emphasized that stubborn inflationary pressures could require interest rates to remain restrictive for longer, while others advocated for more substantial easing in response to early signs of labour market softening. In Europe, the European Central Bank left its three key policy rates unchanged. In its accompanying communication, the ECB reiterated its commitment to a “data-dependent” and “meeting-by-meeting” approach to policy decisions, once again underscoring the absence of any pre-commitment to a predetermined policy path. The prevailing baseline assumption is that the ECB’s easing cycle has effectively concluded and that the next policy move is more likely to be a rate increase. That said, such a shift appears unlikely to materialize in 2026.

December traditionally marks the point at which investors take stock of annual performance, assessing both the successes and shortcomings of the year just ended. In this context, 2025 proved meaningfully different from the patterns that have characterized equity markets over the past decade. From a geographical perspective, the widely discussed “sell America” narrative – gaining traction following the escalation of U.S. tariff measures – has yet to fully materialize. Investor allocations remained tilted toward U.S. assets, particularly in anticipation of long-term benefits from the artificial intelligence investment cycle. Nevertheless, this positioning did not translate into U.S. market outperformance. The primary headwind was the depreciation of the U.S. dollar, which weighed heavily on returns for international investors. Even after adjusting for currency effects, U.S. equity performance appeared broadly in line with global peers, a result that can be interpreted as relative underperformance given the absence of a material macroeconomic disadvantage and the fact that aggregate corporate earnings exceeded expectations. This outcome highlights a second important dynamic: despite pervasive market narratives, leadership in 2025 did not come from technology or consumer discretionary sectors. Instead, more traditional segments – such as financials, industrials, and materials – drove market performance. Consistent with this shift, five of the seven “Magnificent Seven” stocks underperformed the broader market. As a result, 2025 effectively represented the inverse of recent years, during which the U.S. market’s high concentration in a narrow group of large-cap growth stocks amplified its relative outperformance. Looking ahead, should expectations materialize that earnings growth for this select group will converge toward that of the broader U.S. market, the relative performance headwind for U.S. equities may persist. Such a scenario would likely reinforce the case for increased geographic and sectoral diversification within global equity portfolios.

Market Environment and Performance

In the Euro area, economic growth in the Q3 2025 was revised modestly higher to 0.3% improving on the 0.1% expansion recorded in the previous quarter. Business activity continued to strengthen through the year, although the HCOB Eurozone Composite PMI edged lower to 51.9 in December due to softer services momentum and further weakness in manufacturing. New orders growth eased, reflecting a sharper contraction in foreign demand, yet firms continued to increase headcount for a third consecutive month. Consumer price inflation was unchanged at 2.1% in November, revised slightly down the initial 2.2% estimate and remaining close to the European Central Bank’s 2% target.

In the U.S., GDP expanded at an annualised rate of 4.3% in Q3 2025, the strongest pace in two years, up from 3.8% in Q2. Growth was driven primarily by stronger consumer spending, exports and government expenditure. Forward-looking indicators eased but remained consistent with expansion. The Composite PMI fell to 53.0 in December, a six-month low, down from 54.2 in November. The data signalled a moderation in private-sector momentum, with services activity slipping (52.9 v 54.1) and manufacturing (51.8 v 52.2) easing. New business growth slowed to its weakest pace in 20 months, as services demand rose only modestly and goods orders declined for the first time in a year. Headline U.S. inflation closed at 2.7% year-on-year in December, while core inflation, which excludes food and energy, also stood at 2.6%.

In December, global equity markets attempted a final advance to consolidate full-year performance. However, this effort ultimately fell short. The primary drag stemmed from a continued lack of conviction in technology stocks, driven by lingering doubts surrounding the sustainability and timing of returns on artificial intelligence–related investment. In contrast, the semiconductor sector regained momentum, supported by concerns over tightening supply conditions for key components required for the ongoing AI-infrastructure capital-expenditure plans—most notably memory chips. While other sectors outperformed during the month, it became increasingly evident that equity markets struggled to advance meaningfully in the absence of leadership from mega-cap technology stocks. This dynamic also highlighted the recent underperformance of the “Magnificent Seven,” which has weighed on broader U.S. equity performance. As a result, U.S. markets lagged most other regions, while Europe and emerging markets closed the year on a stronger footing. The S&P 500 declined by 0.62% over the month, with communication services and financials among the relative outperformers. In Europe, equity markets were further supported by renewed optimism surrounding the prospect of progress toward a peace agreement in the Ukraine conflict, as the EuroStoxx 50 advanced 2.26% and the DAX gained 2.74%.

Within the fixed-income space, corporate credit markets proved relatively resilient. Investment-grade bonds edged modestly lower but outperformed sovereign debt, which was more directly impacted by rising yields. High-yield credit continued to benefit from a risk-on environment, with U.S. high-yield bonds gaining 0.65% over the month and European high-yield credit posting a 0.35% advance.

Fund performance

In the month of December, the Global Balanced Income Fund registered a loss of 0.22%. On the fixed income allocation, the Fund’s holdings remained unchanged during the month, as the Manager deemed the portfolio appropriately positioned to navigate the current market momentum. On the equity allocation, the Fund’s portfolio has not been changed during the period as the Manager deemed it to be aligned to the overriding market sentiment.

Market and investment outlook

Looking ahead, the Manager observes that the macroeconomic backdrop has softened in recent months, reflecting continued weakness in labour markets and persistent inflationary pressures that have pinched the consumer. While both fiscal and monetary policy settings are still expected to support economic growth, elevated geopolitical tensions introduce a degree of uncertainty that could destabilize an otherwise fragile but constructive environment. In addition, emerging supply-chain frictions could represent a potential risk to prevailing economic forecasts. That said, expectations of a renewed fiscal expansion in the United States ahead of the midterm elections should continue to underpin investor confidence, with a more U.S. administration-aligned Federal Reserve potentially providing additional monetary accommodation. Commodity markets may represent a near-term headwind to this favourable outlook, as rising copper and broader metals prices appear increasingly driven by inflation-hedging behaviour rather than underlying demand fundamentals. Overall, market sentiment continues to point toward a broadly sustainable macroeconomic environment heading into 2026.
 
Within the bond market, expectations for 2026 are for more income driven returns versus price gains from the bond market, as in Europe the ECB indicated that the current inflation levels are aligned to their expectations, while in the U.S. despite markets price more rate cuts, inflation levels remain pretty stubborn. From the equity front, the Manager maintains a prudent yet market-aligned positioning. Portfolio construction remains focused on high-quality companies characterized by strong free-cash-flow generation, durable competitive advantages, and limited sensitivity to economic cycles. At the same time, preserving flexibility within the strategic asset allocation framework remains essential in order to respond effectively to shifts in market conditions.